Survival in Pediatric Patients With Ventricular Assist Devices: A Special Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs) Report

Abstract

BackgroundThe Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs) provides detailed understanding on pediatric patients supported with ventricular assist devices (VADs). We sought to identify important variables affecting mortality in pediatric VADs. MethodsPatients aged <19 years, from 2012 to 2021, were included. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier. Parametric hazard modeling was used to identify risk factors for death. ResultsOf the 1109 patients, the most common devices were implantable continuous (IC, 448 [40%]), followed by paracorporeal pulsatile (PP, 306 [28%]), paracorporeal continuous (PC, 293 [26%]), and percutaneous (58 [5%]). Patients with percutaneous device, infants, congenital heart disease, biventricular support, and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profile 1 had worse overall survival at 6 months. Positive outcome was 83% at 6 months. Consistent with their cohort composition, device type positive outcomes at 6 months were IC, 92%; PP, 84%; and PC, 69%. Parametric hazard modeling for overall survival showed an early hazard for death with biventricular support, congenital heart disease (CHD), intubation before implantation, PC device, and renal impairment, whereas a constant hazard was associated with ascites. For patients <10 kg, parametric modeling showed an early hazard for CHD, intubation, and renal impairment. Modeling in CHD patients showed an early hazard for biventricular support, renal impairment, and use of PC/PP devices. ConclusionsThis multivariable analysis of the complete Pedimacs database demonstrates that illness at VAD implantation, diagnosis, and strategy of support affect survival and differ by device type. We hope this is the first step in creating a predictive tool to help providers and families have informed expectations.