Abstract
5119 Background: Men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer face difficult treatment decisions. Evidence about the relative survival benefit of treatment options is lacking or piecemeal. Side-effects can vary widely with treatment, affecting some fundamental aspects of quality of life (QOL). Little is known about patients’ views of the relative tolerability of these side-effects or the survival gains needed to justify them. Methods: QOL data were collected prospectively 3 years post-diagnosis in a population-based cohort of men treated for localized prostate cancer (n=1642); these data were used to identify common side-effect profiles. A patient preference survey was conducted in a subset (n=357, stratified by treatment); hypothetical treatment alternatives were described in terms of side-effects and survival. Random parameter logit models were estimated. We adapted the concept of compensating variation from welfare economics to derive a parameter function for the value of changes in QOL in terms of survival time; i.e., the survival gains needed to justify persistent side-effects. Bootstrap confidence intervals (CI) were constructed. Results: The table shows the survival gains needed for a range of common treatment profiles, relative to the base case of active surveillance (in which men typically experienced mild loss of libido and mild fatigue). For example, radical prostatectomy often resulted in severe impotence and mild urinary leakage; men required an extra 8.0 months (95% CI 7.4–8.7) of life to make this worthwhile. Generally, urinary dysfunction and bowel symptoms were considered the least tolerable, hormonal symptoms and fatigue came next, and sexual dysfunction was considered relatively benign. This pattern was relatively consistent across treatment groups. Conclusions: These results highlight the need for better evidence about the actual survival benefits of alternative treatments. They also help to target supportive care to optimize patient QOL after treatment for localized prostate cancer. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.