Abstract

We first study a model, introduced recently in [4], of a critical branching random walk in an IID random environment on the $d$-dimensional integer lattice. The walker performs critical (0-2) branching at a lattice point if and only if there is no ‘obstacle’ placed there. The obstacles appear at each site with probability $p\in [0,1)$ independently of each other. We also consider a similar model, where the offspring distribution is subcritical. Let $S_n$ be the event of survival up to time $n$. We show that on a set of full $\mathbb P_p$-measure, as $n\to \infty $, $P^{\omega }(S_n)\sim 2/(qn)$ in the critical case, while this probability is asymptotically stretched exponential in the subcritical case. Hence, the model exhibits ‘self-averaging’ in the critical case but not in the subcritical one. I.e., in the first case, the asymptotic tail behavior is the same as in a ‘toy model’ where space is removed, while in the second, the spatial survival probability is larger than in the corresponding toy model, suggesting spatial strategies. A spine decomposition of the branching process along with known results on random walks are utilized.

Highlights

  • The environment is determined by placing obstacles on each site, with probability

  • Turning back to our spatial model, simulations suggested the self averaging property of the model: the asymptotics for the annealed and the quenched case are the same. This asymptotics is the same as the one in (1.4), where p = 1 − q is the probability that a site has a obstacle

  • The proof only uses the fact that if φ is the generating function of the offspring distribution, φ(z) ≥ z on [0, 1]. This remains the case for subcritical branching too, since φ(1) = 1, φ (1) < 1 and φ is convex from above on the interval

Read more

Summary

Introduction

We will consider the same model when critical branching is replaced by a subcritical one, with mean μ < 1 In this latter case we will make the following standard assumption. Turning back to our spatial model (with critical branching), simulations suggested (see [4]) the self averaging property of the model: the asymptotics for the annealed and the quenched case are the same. This asymptotics is the same as the one in (1.4), where p = 1 − q is the probability that a site has a obstacle. Those simulation results suggest that spatial survival strategies do exists, which are not detectable at the logarithmic scale but are visible at the second-order level

Some preliminary results
Further preparation
Proof of Theorem 2 — critical case
Proof of Theorem 2 — subcritical case

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.