Abstract

5020 Background: The standard adjuvant treatment for men with stage I testicular seminoma remains controversial within the literature. We analyzed survival and secondary malignancy rates in men with stage I seminoma who underwent adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) or observation (OB) following orchiectomy. Methods: Data was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (SEER) of the U.S. National Cancer Institute from 1973 - 2003. The primary end points were overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS). Multivariate Cox regression models were utilized to study the significance of clinical variables: age at diagnosis, laterality of primary disease, race (white, black, American Indian, Asian/pacific islander) and radiation group. Standardized incidence ratios (observed-to-expected [O/E] ratio) and absolute excess risks of secondary malignancies were also assessed for each subgroup. Results: Out of 6,764 patients eligible for analysis, 5,265 were treated with RT and 1,499 with OB. After a median follow up of 7.6 years, the 5-, 10- and 20- year OS rates for the RT versus OB were 97.9 vs. 95.0; 92.2 vs. 92.2; and 83.6 vs. 84.1 (p= 0.005), respectively. The CSS rates for the same time periods were 99.6 vs. 98.7; 99.2 vs. 98.7; and 99.2 vs. 98.7 (p= 0.002), respectively. Adjuvant RT was associated with improved CSS on multivariate analysis with HR 0.37 (CI 0.19–0.70, p= 0.002). Overall, 312 patients developed secondary malignancies which was significantly higher than the endemic rate (O/E 1.43, p<0.05). RT patients had an increased rate of secondary malignancies when compared with the OB population (O/E 1.93, p<0.05). RT population were at excess risk for contralateral testicular, pancreatic, and hematologic malignancies (p<0.05). Conclusions: Within this large United States population analysis, adjuvant RT was associated with improved CSS for men with stage I testicular seminoma. The incidence of secondary malignancies was also found to be significantly increased for the RT group. Further studies are needed to determine if modern RT techniques and field-size reductions may lead to improvements in the therapeutic ratio. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.