Survival analysis of famotidine administration routes in non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage patients: based on the MIMIC-IV database

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective This study compared the survival outcomes of non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients with different famotidine administration routes and explored related risk factors. Methods Data from ICH patients between 2008-2019 were extracted from the MIMIC-IV database. Survival differences between patients with intravenous (IV) and non-intravenous (Non-IV) famotidine administration were analyzed using Cox analysis and Kaplan–Meier survival curves. Results The study included 351 patients, with 109 in the IV group and 84 in the Non-IV group after PSM. Cox analysis revealed that survival was significantly associated with age (HR = 1.031, 95%CI:1.011-1.050, p = 0.002), chloride ions (HR = 1.061, 95%CI:1.027-1.096, p < 0.001), BUN (HR = 1.034, 95%CI:1.007-1.062, p = 0.012), ICP (HR = 1.059, 95%CI:1.027-1.092, p < 0.001), RDW (HR = 1.156, 95%CI:1.030-1.299, p = 0.014), mechanical ventilation (HR = 2.526, 95%CI:1.341-4.760, p = 0.004), antibiotic use (HR = 0.331, 95%CI:0.144-0.759, p = 0.009), and Non-IV route (HR = 0.518, 95%CI:0.283-0.948, p = 0.033). Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significantly higher 30-day survival rate in the Non-IV group (p = 0.011), particularly in patients with normal ICP (HR = 0.518, 95%CI:0.283-0.948, p = 0.033). Conclusion Non-IV famotidine administration significantly improves 30-day survival of ICH patients, especially for those with normal ICP, compared to IV administration.