Abstract

Despite substantial improvements in survival from childhood cancer during the last decades, there are indications that survival rates for several cancer types are no longer improving. Moreover, evidence accumulates suggesting that socioeconomic and sociodemographic factors may have an impact on survival also in high-income countries. The aim of this review is to summarize the findings from studies on social factors and survival in childhood cancer. Several types of cancer and social factors are included in order to shed light on potential mechanisms and identify particularly affected groups. A literature search conducted in PubMed identified 333 articles published from December 2012 until June 2018, of which 24 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The findings are diverse; some studies found no associations but several indicated a social gradient with higher mortality among children from families of lower socioeconomic status (SES). There were no clear suggestions of particularly vulnerable subgroups, but hematological malignancies were most commonly investigated. A wide range of social factors have been examined and seem to be of different importance and varying between studies. However, potential underlying mechanisms linking a specific social factor to childhood cancer survival was seldom described. This review provides some support for a relationship between lower parental SES and worse survival after childhood cancer, which is a finding that needs further attention. Studies investigating predefined hypotheses involving specific social factors within homogenous cancer types are lacking and would increase the understanding of mechanisms involved, and allow targeted interventions to reduce health inequalities.

Highlights

  • From low survival rates in the 1970’s and earlier, overall 5 years survival from childhood cancer is exceeding 80% in most of Europe [1, 2]

  • Even though several studies support an association between higher parental socioeconomic status (SES) and better survival, findings differ between countries, cancer types, and SES indicator studied

  • This review indicated that in high income countries, parental income is not the driver of the association but instead other SES indicators such as education, having insurance, or place of residence seemed to be of importance [8]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

From low survival rates in the 1970’s and earlier, overall 5 years survival from childhood cancer is exceeding 80% in most of Europe [1, 2]. SES and Childhood Cancer Survival accumulates suggesting that socioeconomic and sociodemographic factors may be associated with survival even in high-income countries where children are presumed to have equal access to health care services, see for example [4,5,6,7]. This does highlight a potential inequality that needs attention, but might imply a possibility of improving childhood cancer survival rates overall, by addressing this potential gap. Differences in treatment and prognosis between cancer types are likely to influence

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.