Survey study of barriers to evidence-based decision-making in oncology care using next-generation sequencing.

Abstract

e18757 Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has the potential to accelerate precision medicine in oncology by informing efficient and improved clinical treatment decision-making. However, discussions on the utility of NGS in clinical practice are ongoing. This survey study examined clinical utility barriers to adoption of NGS into oncologic care. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was sent to a nationally representative sample of oncologists/hematologists, surgeons, and pathologists (N=201). The survey gathered information on physician demographics, practice characteristics, perceived barriers to NGS testing, and potential strategies for increasing adoption. Results: Almost all physicians in the sample (99.5%) reported using NGS. Physicians reported the following aspects of NGS as the most valuable: ability to guide decision-making (73.1%), more accurate identification of corresponding treatment (56.7%), comprehensive genomic coverage (54.2%), efficient technology with faster turnaround time (49.8%), and more accurate diagnosis or prognosis (41.3%). Physicians reported that NGS results guided treatment decisions for 63% of patients (Range: 2% - 100%). Over 85% of physicians reported that confidence in interpreting results and availability of clinical guidelines were important in undertaking NGS. Correspondingly, limited evidence of clinical utility was a top barrier to testing (80.1%), with pathologists and surgeons more likely than oncologists/hematologists to consider this. Overall, 76% of physicians shared that strategies to alleviate these clinical utility barriers included increased evidence, standardized guidelines, and interpretation support. Conclusions: Given the high uptake of NGS testing in this physician sample, but the lower rates of application of test results to guide treatment, the clinical impact of NGS may not be fully optimized. This discrepancy highlights the ongoing need for real-world evidence to better understand and further optimize the evolving role of NGS in the context of the overall management of the cancer patient. [Table: see text]