Abstract
Routing is a crucial issue in MANET due to the absence of fixed infrastructure and centralized administration. Many routing protocols like Ad-hoc On-demand Distance Vector (AODV), Dynamic Source Routing (DSR), and Destination Sequenced Distance Vector (DSDV) have been proposed to find the optimized path from source node to destination nodes. This paper analyzed the performance of AODV, DSR and DSDV on the basis of sent packets, received packets and Quality of Service (QoS) metrics like throughput, end to end delay, packet delivery ratio, packet loss ratio with varying network load and network size. Index Terms : AODV, DSR, DSDV, QoS, Routing Protocols. DOI: 10.7176/CEIS/11-3-03 Publication date: May 31 st 2020
Highlights
Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs) are self-configuring networks consisting of mobile nodes that are communicating through wireless links
Performance Measuring Parameter The performance of Ad Hoc On-demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV), Dynamic Source Routing (DSR) and Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector (DSDV) were measured based on throughput, delay, packet delivery ratio (PDR) and packet loss ratio (PLR)
In this paper, the performance of routing protocol namely AODV, DSR and DSDV were measured with respect to QoS metrics such as throughput, delay, PDR, PLR in two different scenarios: - varying network load and network size
Summary
Mobile Ad-hoc Networks (MANETs) are self-configuring networks consisting of mobile nodes that are communicating through wireless links. Rajeshkumar, 2015) has presented a performance comparison and study of reactive and proactive protocols AODV, DSR and DSDV based on metrics such as throughput, control overhead, packet delivery ratio and average end-to-end delay. Sajjad Ali and Asad Ali, have analyzed performance of AODV, DSR, and OLSR routing protocols by three metrics: delay, network load and throughput They identified the best routing protocols for Mobile Ad-hoc Network. (Ankita Sharma, 2014) has presented the performance of AODV, DSR and DSDV MANET protocols for different number of nodes and mobility with different traffic channels CBR and FTP They considered performance metrics such as packet delivery ratio, throughput and average end-to-end delay. Scalable: The algorithm is highly scalable because of the minimum space complexity and broadcasts avoided
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
