Abstract
Molecular characterization of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is challenging due to the complex nature of its associated disease, colibacillosis, in poultry. Numerous efforts have been made toward defining APEC, and it is becoming clear that certain clonal backgrounds are predictive of an avian E. coli isolate's virulence potential. Thus, APEC can be further differentiated as high-risk APEC based upon their clonal background's virulence potential. However, less clear is the degree of overlap between clinical isolates of differing bird type, and between clinical and gastrointestinal isolates. This study aimed to determine genomic similarities and differences between such populations, comparing commercial broiler vs. turkey isolates, and clinical vs. gastrointestinal isolates. Differences were observed in Clermont phylogenetic groups between isolate populations, with B2 as the dominant group in turkey clinical isolates and G as the dominant group in broiler clinical isolates. Nearly all clinical isolates were classified as APEC using a traditional gene-based typing scheme, whereas 53.4% and 44.1% of broiler and turkey gastrointestinal isolates were classified as APEC, respectively. High-risk APEC were identified among 31.0% and 46.9% of broiler and turkey clinical isolates, compared with 5.7% and 2.9% of broiler and turkey gastrointestinal isolates. As found in previous studies, no specific known virulence or fitness gene sets were identified which universally differentiate between clinical and gastrointestinal isolates. This study further demonstrates the utility of a hybrid APEC typing approach, considering both plasmid content and clonal background, for the identification of dominant and highly virulent APEC clones in poultry production.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.