Abstract

Burning rate plays a crucial role in determining the performance of solid rocket motors (SRMs). In the traditional approach for solid propellant propulsion, technical activities regarding burning rates are developed at three different operational levels: (i) Strand burners or laboratory-scale devices in general; (ii) Small-scale motors (SSMs); And (iii) full-size or end-item rocket motors. While strand burners are extensively used for propellant development (formulation exploration, ingredients screening, performance verification, and production control) and relatively little is done experimentally at the full-size motor level (being large-scale experimentation too expensive and dangerous), a lot is usually carried out at SSM level to obtain burning rate information under motor operating conditions. In the introductory part of this work, burning rate fundamentals are recalled and burning rate measurement devices are quickly summarized. Then, a survey of subscale motors is conducted and several automated procedures to deduce burning rate from SSM testing are analyzed. Data reduction methods commonly used by leading European companies are based on the thickness-over-time (TOT) definition. Attention is dedicated to procedures used in Italy and France for quality control of the European space launchers (solid propellant boosters of Ariane family and core solid rocket motors of VEGA family). In addition, automated data reduction methods based on mass balance (MB) and often used in USA are investigated. Specific features and general trends of the tested industrial procedures are pointed out. Since for any tests the actual burning rates are unknown, results can only be compared based on the statistical quality of the deduced ballistic data. Mainly reproducibility, ease of application, and suitability for automated computer implementation are of interest to industrial users. The effects of test variability, input data quality, and data reduction methods on result reproducibility are discussed with reference to fire tests of the successful Ariane-5 solid boosters. The systematic analysis of industrial data conducted in this work suggests that improving the actual mix reproducibility and quality of experimental data is more important than perfecting the current data reduction methods. Moreover, the international trends suggest that the fundamental TOT procedures are being replaced by MB procedures or advanced TOT procedures with burning times evaluated using pressure integrals.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call