Abstract

Introduction: Recent evidence suggests the need to proceed with a surveillance colonoscopy in patients above the age of 40 years who undergo appendicectomy for acute appendicitis, given the higher risk of an underlying colonic tumor. After anecdotally observing a substantial variability in terms of adaptation of these recommendations by the on-call surgical teams, we performed a clinical audit regarding our relevant endoscopic follow-up compliance rates to identify areas for improvement of our practise. Materials Methods: We performed a retrospective review of the electronic records of all patients above 40 years who had appendicectomy for acute appendicitis within a 3-year period in our institution, assessing as primary outcome the actual performance of a follow-up colonoscopy and the detected endoscopic findings. Results: Our results demonstrated that more than 80% of our patients did not have an endoscopic follow-up, as suggested by the current evidence. In addition, with respect to the subspecialisation of the parent surgical team, it seems that non-colorectal teams had lower compliance regarding the arrangement of endoscopic surveillance, when compared to specialist colorectal team. Conclusions: Emergency surgical teams need to be further educated with respect to the current practise recommendations concerning the appropriate endoscopic follow-up after the performance of appendicectomy for acute appendicitis. Establishment of dedicated bundles of postoperative care, as well as clear relevant guidance from the gastrointestinal/emergency surgery societies would be of great value in this direction.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.