Surveillance and the Political Value of Privacy

Benjamin J Goold

doi:10.37974/alf.80

Abstract

The steady expansion in the use of surveillance technologies by the state and private sector represents a substantial threat to the privacy of ordinary individuals. Yet despite the best efforts of civil libertarians, many members of the public still struggle to understand why privacy is valuable and deserves to be protected as a basic right. In part, this is a result of the inherent complexity of the idea of privacy, but it is also due a tendency on the part of privacy advocates to focus on the individual - as opposed to the social and political dimensions - of privacy. In order to ensure that there is a greater level of public engagement with matters of privacy and sufficient awareness of the dangers of intrusive surveillance, more must be done to ensure that the general public appreciates that privacy is not just essential for individual freedom, but also for the health of society as a whole.

Highlights

Of all the rights typically enshrined in domestic and international human rights instruments, privacy is perhaps one of the most problematic.[1]
Given that the last twenty years has seen a profound expansion in the apparatus of surveillance in Europe and North America,[2] this continuing disjuncture between the level of academic and public interest in privacy is deeply worrying
A public that is unable to understand why privacy is important – or which lacks the conceptual tools necessary to engage in meaningful debates about its value – is likely to be susceptible to arguments that privacy should be curtailed

Summary

Introduction

Of all the rights typically enshrined in domestic and international human rights instruments, privacy is perhaps one of the most problematic.[1]. Given that the last twenty years has seen a profound expansion in the apparatus of surveillance in Europe and North America,[2] this continuing disjuncture between the level of academic and public interest in privacy is deeply worrying.

Results

Conclusion