Abstract

BackgroundThe goal of surveillance testing is to enable curative salvage therapy through early disease detection, however supporting evidence in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is limited. We evaluated frequency of successful salvage therapy and outcomes in patients who underwent surveillance.MethodsA single‐site, retrospective cohort study was conducted to identify all patients who received curative resection for gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Surveillance testing were those investigations not triggered by abnormal symptoms, physical examination, or blood tests. Successful salvage therapy was any potentially curative therapy for disease recurrence which resulted in postrecurrence disease‐free survival ≥2 years. Time‐to‐event data were analyzed using the Kaplan‐Meier method and log rank tests.ResultsBetween 2011 and 2016, 210 consecutive patients were reviewed. Esophageal (14%), gastroesophageal junction (40%), and gastric adenocarcinomas (45%) were treated with surgery alone (29%) or multimodality therapy (71%). Adjuvant therapy was administered in 35%. At median follow‐up of 38.3 months, 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate was 56%. Among 97 recurrences, 53% were surveillance‐detected, and 46% were symptomatic. None was detected by surveillance endoscopy. Median time‐to‐recurrence (TTR) was 14.8 months. Recurrences included locoregional only (4%), distant (86%), and both (10%). Salvage therapy was attempted in 15 patients, 4 were successful. Compared to symptomatic recurrences, patients with surveillance‐detected recurrences had longer median OS (36.2 vs 23.7 months, P = .004) and postrecurrence survival (PRS, 16.5 vs 4.6 months, P < .001), but similar TTR (16.2 vs 13.3 months, P = .40) and duration of palliative chemotherapy (3.9 vs 3.3 months, P = .64).ConclusionsAmong patients surveyed, 96% of recurrences were distant, and salvage therapy was successful in only 1.9% of patients. Longer OS in patients with surveillance‐detected compared to symptomatic recurrences was not associated with significant earlier disease detection, and may be contributed by differences in disease biology. Further prospective data are warranted to establish the benefit of surveillance testing in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Highlights

  • Despite advances in curative therapy, recurrence rates of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma remain high at approximately 40%-50%.1-3 Because of the poor outcomes of recurrent disease, earlier detection at the asymptomatic stage may allow timely intervention and improved outcomes

  • We examined the benefit of routine surveillance testing following curative resection of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma

  • From the institutional Registry of Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (PMCC), we identified consecutive patients with esophageal, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), and gastric adenocarcinoma who had curative resection between 2011 and 2016 and subsequent surveillance (Supplementary 1)

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Despite advances in curative therapy, recurrence rates of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma remain high at approximately 40%-50%.1-3 Because of the poor outcomes of recurrent disease, earlier detection at the asymptomatic stage may allow timely intervention and improved outcomes. Despite advances in curative therapy, recurrence rates of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma remain high at approximately 40%-50%.1-3. Because of the poor outcomes of recurrent disease, earlier detection at the asymptomatic stage may allow timely intervention and improved outcomes. Routine surveillance testing in patients with resected locally advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is not yet supported by robust supprting evidence. Previous retrospective studies have been attempted, important limitations including sample size, outdated preoperative staging, potentially suboptimal curative therapy, and surveillance imaging techniques[4,5,6] limit the interpretation of these data. We examined the benefit of routine surveillance testing following curative resection of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. We aimed to evaluate (a) recurrence patterns, (b) frequency of successful salvage therapy, and (c) outcomes for patients with asymptomatic recurrence detected by surveillance testing compared to those with symptomatic recurrence

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
| RESULTS
| DISCUSSION
| CONCLUSIONS
Findings
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call