Abstract
Surrogacy, a means of circumventing female infertility, is a contentious practice and an ethical minefield. Disputed surrogacy agreements invariably hit the news headlines and reopen public debate on the issue. The Warnock Committee in 1994 expressed grave reservations about surrogacy but an expression of minority dissent on the issue evidenced lack of unanimity. This article seeks to show to what extent Warnock's reservations were justified and to chart the increasing acceptability of surrogacy by the judiciary, Parliament and the medical profession.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
