Abstract

Participating life insurance contracts entitle the policyholder to participate in the company’s annual surplus. Typically, they are also equipped with a surrender option that allows the policyholder to terminate the contract prior to maturity, receiving a predetermined surrender value. The option interacts with (often cliquet-style) interest guarantees that are a key feature of traditional participating contracts. Surrender options can considerably affect an insurer’s liabilities and bear material risks. This paper addresses the recognition of those risks in the quantitative assessment of a heterogeneous insurance portfolio under Solvency II, taking into account the complex interrelation between minimum interest guarantees, reserving requirements, and profit sharing. The lapse risk module of the Solvency II standard formula requires the identification of portfolio segments that are exposed to a specific change of surrender rates (long-term increase/decrease, one-off increase). We provide a heuristic that identifies homogeneous risk groups in the sense that the respective stress would increase the insurer’s liabilities. Our approach can be used to derive an appropriate segmentation in practical applications. We further analyze implications of the segmentation on the Risk Margin (as part of the Technical Provisions under Solvency II) and discuss consequences of policyholder options on the calculation of Going Concern Reserve and Surplus Funds. To illustrate our findings, we set up a stochastic balance sheet and cash flow projection model for a stylized life insurance company. We conclude that current methods used for practical applications underestimate surrender risk under Solvency II and that the proposed modeling refinements may improve the appropriateness of solvency ratios for participating business.

Highlights

  • Life insurance policies often come with several policyholder options

  • Under the standard formula, the lapse stresses are only applied to those contracts and options exercise rates that would result in an increase of the Best Estimate of Liabilities (BEL) and a respective loss of Basic Own Funds (BOF) (RM is ignored for this purpose)

  • Our analysis shows that the three considered risk drivers differ in their appropriateness to approximate future Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) for lapse risk and in the computational effort required to derive them

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Life insurance policies often come with several policyholder options. In particular, this includes the surrender option which allows the policyholder to terminate the contract prior to maturity in combination with the payout of a (predetermined) surrender value. Surrender options may significantly affect a company’s future cash flow profile and have material impact on the insurer’s liabilities (Bauer et al 2006; Gatzert 2009; Kling et al 2014) This especially holds for traditional participating life insurance business, which makes up for a significant part of the life insurance market in Germany (and other member states of the European Union). They find that surrender options can be quite valuable (e.g., Albizzati and Geman 1994; Bacinello 2003; Grosen and Jørgensen 2000) Another branch of the existing literature studies the determinants and modeling of surrender behavior, with partly contradictory results. e.g., Geneva Association (2012) do so concentrating on potential illiquidity risks in the life insurance sector due to an increase of surrender rates.

Regulatory Requirements on the Recognition of Policyholder Behavior
General Definitions of Solvency II
Analysis Framework
Financial Market Model
Liability Model
Premium Calculation and Reserving
Surplus Participation and Benefit Payments
Liability Portfolio Development
Surrender Model
Cost Model
Asset Model
Surplus Distribution
Sources of Surplus
Splitting of Surplus
Declaration of Surplus
Allocation of Surplus to Individual Policyholders
Statutory Balance Sheet
Economic Balance Sheet
Base Case
Allowance for Going Concern Reserve
Allowance for Surplus Funds
Numerical Results and Discussion
Model Assumptions
Surrender Risk in the Context of Solvency Capital Requirements
Segmentation Alternative 1
Comparison and Conclusions
Surrender Risk in the Context of the Risk Margin
Explicit Projection of Future Solvency Capital Requirements
Approximation of Future Solvency Capital Requirements
Comparison
Conclusions
The Impact of Lapse Stresses on Going Concern Reserve and Surplus Funds
Going Concern Reserve
Surplus Funds
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call