Abstract
An adequate transverse maxillary dimension is a critical component of a stable and functional occlusion.’ Orthopedic rapid palatal expansion in skeletally immature patients is the procedure of choice to correct this condition in that age group. However, as skeletal maturity approaches, bony interdigitation increases as the sutures fuse.2,3 This leads to difficulty separating the maxillas with orthopedic forces alone and bending of the alveolus, dental tipping and minimal maxillary expansion. The result is relapse despite overcorrection, periodontal defects, and malocclusion.4 A variety of surgical procedures including surgically-assisted rapid palatal expansion (SARPE) and segmental LeFort I osteotomies have been advocated in the treatment of transverse maxillary deficiency in skeletally mature patients. The decision to choose one surgical procedure over another has led to some controversy in the literature. The reasoning behind advocating SARPE will be discussed in this article. The isolated transverse maxillary deficiency can be treated either orthodontically or surgically with rapid palatal expansion. However, the long-term stability of the expansion is directly related to the skeletal maturity of the suture lines.5 Krebs6 showed that as sutures mature the majority of orthopedic rapid palatal expansion occurs by dental tipping and alveolar bone bending rather than by skeletal movement. Relapse, with an open bite deformity, may result when fixation is removed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.