Abstract

Objective: This study is aimed to analyze the outcomes of surgical treatment of glossopharyngeal schwannomas based on pre- and postoperative neurological status assessment. Materials and methods: This paper is a retrospective analysis of examination and surgical treatment of 14 patients who were operated on in two large clinics from 2018 to 2021 inclusive. When analyzing the collected data, gender, age, disease symptoms, tumor size and location, surgical approach, tumor to cranial nerves (CN) ratio, jugular foramen (JF) condition, and tumor removal volume were taken into account. All tumors were divided into groups depending on tumor location relative to the JF. Particular attention was paid to assessing cranial nerves functions. Facial nerve function was assessed as per House-Brackmann Scale (HBS), hearing function as per Gardner-Robertson Scale (GRS). Results: 3 (21.4%) patients had total tumor removal: 2 patients had type A tumors and one had type B tumor. Subtotal resection took place in 7 (50%) cases. In 4 cases, a tumor was partially removed: 3 patients had type D tumors and one had type B tumor. 3 (21.4%) patients had preoperative FN deficit (HBS Grade II) and mild dysfunction. 5 (35.7%) patients had postoperative facial nerve deficit: HBS ІІ, 2; ІІІ, 1; V, 2. Preoperative sensorineural type hearing impairment on the affected side was diagnosed in 13 (92.6%) patients. Before surgery, 6 patients had non-serviceable hearing, which remained at the same level after surgery. None of the patients with grade I or II hearing before surgery had any hearing impairment postoperatively. In 2 (14.3%) cases, hearing improved from grade V to grade III after surgery. 6 (42.9%) patients developed new neurological deficit in the caudal group CN. Postoperative deficit of the caudal group CN occurred in type D tumors in 3 patients, type A tumors 2 patients, and type B tumors one patient. Conclusions: Applying a retrosigmoid approach only makes it possible to achieve total tumor removal in case of type A tumors. To remove other tumor types, it is necessary to select approaches that enable access to the jugular foramen and infratemporal fossa. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is an extremely important tool in glossopharyngeal schwannoma surgery. The most common postoperative complication is a developed or increased deficit of the caudal CN group, which can lead to persistent impairments in the patients’ quality of life. Preservation of the CN VII and VIII function in most cases is a feasible task and shall be ensured as a standard for this pathology.

Highlights

  • Jugular foramen (JF) schwannomas are rarely diagnosed, their occurrence is 2.9%–4.0% of all intracranial schwannomas

  • Caudal cranial nerves (CN) group schwannomas, and meningiomas account for 80% of tumors of this

  • The cisternal tumor part was mostly located in the cerebellopontine angle; CNs VII and VIII were stretched over the upper tumor pole, and caudal CN group under the lower pole

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Jugular foramen (JF) schwannomas are rarely diagnosed, their occurrence is 2.9%–4.0% of all intracranial schwannomas. These tumors most often originate from the glossopharyngeal, vagus, and accessory cranial nerves (CN). This pathology is located in a rather complex and hard-to-reach anatomical structure — the JF, which contains a lot of neurovascular structures, such as: jugular vein, inferior petrosal sinus, cochlear tubule vein, glossopharyngeal, vagus, and accessory CN. Surgical removal of such tumor is associated with a high risk of postoperative neurological deficit. Determination of surgical approach depends on preoperative differential tumor diagnosis. Caudal CN group schwannomas, and meningiomas account for 80% of tumors of this

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call