Abstract
BackgroundAtlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) is a not rare abnormality between the atlas (C1) and axis (C2). For AAS patients with persistent neck pain and neurologic symptoms, surgical intervention is a good choice. Nevertheless, there were still few reports about the use of intraoperative skull traction and different fixation methods in treatment of AAS.MethodsFrom January 2012 to December 2018, a total of 86 cases were admitted to our hospital and diagnosed as AAS. All the patients received atlantoaxial reduction with the help of intraoperative skull traction and C1-C2 fixation. Clinical and radiological parameters were collected through chart review.ResultsThere were 86 cases included in this study. The mean operative time was 153.9 ± 73.9 min, and the mean amount of intraoperative blood loss was 219.1 ± 195.6 ml. 81 patients underwent posterior reduction, internal fixation and fusion. 5 patients underwent anterior release, followed by posterior internal fixation and fusion. 82 patients got satisfactory postoperative outcomes while complications occurred in 4 patients. Significant neurologic improvement was observed in these patients. Bone fusion was achieved on the midline sagittal reconstructed CT images at the latest follow-up in all these patients except 1 case. All the patients were followed up for 34.84 ± 15.86 months at average (range 12–60 months). The mean ADI value was 7.55 ± 1.67 mm at average preoperatively, and improved to 4.03 ± 1.21 mm postoperatively, and to 4.21 ± 0.99 mm at the latest follow-up. The mean A-A angle was 15.48 ± 9.82 degrees at average preoperatively, and improved to 21.61 ± 10.43 degrees postoperatively, and to 19.73 ± 8.13 degrees at the latest follow-up. The mean A-A height was 35.61 ± 7.66 mm at average preoperatively, and improved to 40.08 ± 8.5 mm postoperatively, and to 38.83 ± 6.97 mm at the latest follow-up. There were complications in 4 patients, including pedicle misplacement, pedicle screw fracture, infection and one death.ConclusionIntraoperative skull traction can effectively facilitate the surgical procedures for ASS caused by different etiologies. Further research will be needed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of this method in the future.
Highlights
Atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) is a not rare abnormality between the atlas (C1) and axis (C2)
In our study, we retrospectively investigated clinical outcomes of AAS using different fixation methods with the help of intraoperative skull traction
Skull traction has been widely used for cervical bone fracture, scoliosis correction, the reduction of AAS and et al Skull traction under general anesthesia, in which the utility of neuromuscular blockade can remove the tension of cervical muscle and ligaments and make the reduction easier
Summary
Atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) is a not rare abnormality between the atlas (C1) and axis (C2). Several diseases have been reported to be associated with the occurrence and development of AAS, including inflammatory, congenital, traumatic, and neoplastic processes [1, 2] These processes can damage the zygopophysis joint or ligament between the atlas (C1) and axis (C2), and cause excessive movement and instability at this junction, resulting in atlantoaxial subluxation. Multiple procedures have been used to stabilize the atlantoaxial joints and achieve spinal cord decompression These procedures were performed by fixation between C1 and C2 at either a lateral mass [4], a pedicle [5], a lamina of C2 [6], or transarticular screws [7]. We conduct this study to evaluate the surgical outcomes and radiological improvement of AAS by using intraoperative skull traction and different fixation methods
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
