Surgical Treatment for Popliteal Artery Entrapment Syndrome in Japan: a Retrospective, Multicentre Study Using a National Clinical Registry

Abstract

Surgical treatment is an established method for popliteal artery entrapment syndrome (PAES), which, however, mainly derives from single centre experiences where PAES cases are centralised and treated periodically. This study evaluated clinical outcomes of surgical treatment for PAES in a clinical setting where PAES cases were not centralised. Multicentre, retrospective cohort study using a national clinical registry. From a Japanese nationwide clinical registry, data for patients who underwent surgical treatment for PAES between 2013 and 2018, including 58 limbs from 41 institutes, were retrieved and evaluated. Patency was analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves. The mean patient age was 36 ± 19 years, 78% were male, and the incidence of PAES was 0.24 limbs/centre/year, reflecting a clinical setting where PAES cases are not centralised. The most frequent arterial symptom was intermittent claudication (90%). Computed tomography was performed in 57 limbs (98%) for the diagnosis, however active manoeuvres such as dorsiflexion and plantarflexion during the examination was performed in only 13 limbs (22%), and occlusion of the popliteal artery was present in 38 limbs (66%) at diagnosis. Regarding surgical treatment, myotomy alone was performed in only seven limbs (12%), and other limbs were revascularised. Mean follow up was 26 ± 20 months, and surgical treatment was effective as it relieved symptoms in > 96% of limbs, with five year primary and secondary patency of the surgical treatment for PAES of 72% and 93%, respectively. Results of surgical treatment were acceptable even in a clinical setting where PAES cases were not centralised. However, a low incidence of active manoeuvres performed during the examination and a high incidence of occlusion at diagnosis suggests there may be delayed or underdiagnosis of PAES in Japan, and increased awareness for PAES is warranted.