Abstract
AbstractObjectiveOral leukoplakia (OL) is one of the most common and investigated oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD). Preventing OSCC occurrence should be the primary outcome in the clinical management of OL. Surgical removal of OL is performed by most clinicians, although its effectiveness in reducing OSCC onset has still not been established by randomized controlled trials (RCT). Wait and see approach is characterized by frequent clinical examinations and periodical biopsies of OL, avoiding unnecessary surgical procedures.This is the first multicenter RCT in literature aiming at comparing the effectiveness of surgical removal and the “wait and see” approach in preventing OSCC onset in patients affected by dysplastic and non‐dysplastic OL.MethodsTwo Italian referral care centres for oral diseases were involved in this multicenter two‐arm RCT comparing the surgical removal of OL (group A) and the “wait and see” approach (group B), with the aim of reducing oral cancer onset.ResultsThis report shows preliminary data on the first 161 patients, with a mean follow‐up of 19.14 ± 11.25 months. Eight cases of OSCC occurred (6 out 8 involving the tongue): one case in group A and seven cases in group B. Moreover, OL recurred in 13 (20%) cases after surgical excision.ConclusionsWithin the limitations of this preliminary report, these initial data underline the increased risk of OSCC onset in the case of OL of the tongue in the presence of epithelial dysplasia in group B (“wait and see”) compared to group A (surgery). This RCT is currently ongoing at the same clinical departments, with the aim of enrolling 310 patients and collecting data at 5‐year follow‐up, in order to achieve conclusive results, in an evidence‐based medicine approach.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.