Abstract

Despite standardization of surgical treatment of primary malignant tumors of the pelvis and spine, prognosis in these centrally located tumors still is inferior compared to those located in the extremities. This fact may be attributed to delayed diagnosis in many cases and the resulting increase in tumor volume as well as to difficulties of resection due to the anatomical situation. The frequency of local recurrence after resection of primary malignant tumors is reported to be between 4 and 41% and the 5-year survival rate below 40%. Whereas the latter has remained almost unchanged during the past 20 years, amputation has been replaced by limb-salvage surgery except for a minimal amount of less than 10%. For reconstruction, biological techniques are increasingly preferred to endoprosthetic replacement or use of bulk allografts because of the high complication rate. Even in the spine wide resections are feasible provided at least one lamina is healthy in order to prepare and save the neural structures without touching the tumor. Compared to the widely used technique of curettage, en bloc resection may provide a significantly better oncologic result with respect to local tumor control. Failure of the dorsoventral stabilization with delayed union is the most frequent complication of these challenging procedures. In order to improve the long-term prognosis of these groups of patients in the future, early diagnosis and immediate admission to a specialized tumor service has to be attempted.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call