Abstract

Metastatic lesion to the pancreas accounts for approximately 2% of pancreatic neoplasms. There is no prospective, randomized or case-controlled study evaluating the role of pancreatic metastasectomy. The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched for studies published between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2017. Studies with five or more patients who received pancreatic metastasectomy and data from our institution (29 patients) were included. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. A total of 414 patients from 20 institutions who underwent pancreatic resections were included. Of the reported 31 kinds of primary neoplasms, renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) comprised the most (54.3%). At the time of diagnosis, although 40.3% patients were asymptomatic, abdominal pain (34.8%) and jaundice (20.6%) were relatively common. As for surgical type, pancreatoduodenectomy, total pancreatectomy, distal pancreatectomy, and enucleation took up 37.9%, 11.4%, 43.5%, and 7.2% respectively. The mortality and morbidity rates were 1.4% and 48.3% respectively. Patients with symptoms at the time of diagnosis had significantly shorter survival compared with asymptomatic patients (p = 0.017). Those with RCC as primary tumor had significantly longer survival compared with non-RCC patients (p < 0.001). Positive margin also predicts worse prognosis (p = 0.035). Pancreatic metastasectomy is safe and associated with acceptable short- and intermediate-term results. In the conditions of RCC as the primary tumor, being asymptomatic, or negative resection margin, a better prognosis after resection can be achieved.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.