Surgical renal artery reconstruction after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

Abstract

Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) is a controversial treatment for renal artery stenosis. This article discusses whether or not a prior attempt at PTRA compromises a subsequent elective or emergent surgical revascularization. Thirteen patients had surgical renal artery reconstruction after one or more PTRAs. Eight of the patients were treated because of atherosclerotic renal artery disease whereas five had a form of fibromuscular dysplasia. Five patients had renal artery injury directly related to the angioplasty. Four of these kidneys were saved. Eight patients were treated from 6 to 920 days after PTRA because of recurrent stenosis or occlusion of the renal artery. Only one of these kidneys was lost, an attempt at revascularization of a small kidney that failed to resume function. A prior attempt at PTRA did not compromise the ability of subsequent surgical revascularization to ameliorate hypertension. We conclude that surgical renal revascularization is not made less likely to succeed by a previous attempt at PTRA; even if the renal artery is thrombosed or perforated during the procedure, a reasonable chance of renal salvage is obtained by immediate surgical revascularization.