Abstract
To assess the results of endoscopic ureterocele treatments as well as the effects of ureterocele location (intravesical vs. ectopic) and anatomy (single vs. duplicated system) on treatment outcomes. Following the Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standards, several medical databases as well as Google Scholar were searched comprehensively. Studies describing secondary operation outcomes for endoscopic transurethral incision and puncture were included. Studies were required to compare patients according to ureterocele location (intravesical or ectopic) and anatomy (single or duplex system) or preoperative reflux. Meta-analysis was conducted using Comprehensive Meta-analysis (CMA) software. A total of 83 studies entered this systematic review consisting of 3022 patients. According to the meta-analysis of 16 studies, the risk ratio (RR) of reoperation after ureterocele incision was significantly higher in patients with ectopic vs. intravesical ureteroceles (RR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.89-3.11; P<0.001; I2: 14.89%). Also, a higher reoperation rate was reported in patients with duplex system ureteroceles (DSU) vs. single system ureteroceles (SSU) with little heterogeneity based on 9 studies. (RR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.60-3.91; P<0.001; I2: 13.83%). Our results showed that ectopic ureteroceles and duplex systems are associated with higher reoperation rates after endoscopic procedures.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
