Abstract
PurposeTo compare the surgical outcomes of unilateral lateral rectus recession–medial rectus resection (RR) according to forced duction test (FDT) results with those of conventional RR in intermittent exotropia.MethodsA total of 129 patients aged 3 to 10 years with intermittent exotropia who underwent RR between 2006 and 2011 were included. The operator compared the tension of the lateral rectus (LR) between both eyes. When FDT results were asymmetric, RR was performed on the eye with more LR tension. RR was performed on the nondominant eye when FDT results were symmetric. Patients were divided into two groups; one group (n = 64) underwent RR without FDT (RR group) and the other group (n = 65) underwent RR considering FDT results (RR-FDT group). Success, recurrence, reoperation rates and cumulative probabilities of success were evaluated in both groups. Surgical outcome was considered satisfactory if the distance deviation in the primary position was between ≤ 10 PD of exophoria/tropia and ≤ 10 PD of esophoria/tropia. Recurrence was defined as an alignment of > 10 PD of exophoria/tropia, and overcorrection defined as > 10 PD of esophoria/tropia. Reoperation for recurrence was recommended for constant exotropia ≥ 14 PD at distance.ResultsThe total follow-up periods were 4.4±2.3 years in the RR group, and 3.9±2.0 years in the RR-FDT group (P = .310). In the RR group, 50 patients (78.1%) were successful, 13 patients (20.3%) had recurrence, and 1 patient (1.6%) had overcorrection at 2 years after surgery. In the RR-FDT group, 58 patients (89.2%) were successful, 5 patients (7.7%) had recurrence, and 2 patients (3.1%) were overcorrected. The recurrence rate at 2 years after operation was significantly lower in the RR-FDT group (P = .045). Recurrence rates during the follow-up period were 5.6% per person-year in the RR group and 2.7% per person-year in the RR-FDT group. Reoperation for recurrence was performed on 7 patients (10.8%) in the RR-FDT group and 16 patients (25.0%) in the RR group (P = .035). Postoperative sensory outcomes were similar between both groups.ConclusionsThe forced duction test was useful in reducing the risk of recurrence at 2 years after surgery when RR was performed on the eye with more passive tension of the LR. Intraoperative FDT may be considered to choose which eye to operate on when planning RR in intermittent exotropia.
Highlights
Intermittent exotropia (IXT) is the most common form of exotropia and is more prevalent among Asians [1,2,3]
The recurrence rate at 2 years after operation was significantly lower in the rectus resection (RR)-forced duction test (FDT) group (P = .045)
The forced duction test was useful in reducing the risk of recurrence at 2 years after surgery when RR was performed on the eye with more passive tension of the lateral rectus muscle (LR)
Summary
Intermittent exotropia (IXT) is the most common form of exotropia and is more prevalent among Asians [1,2,3]. Exotropic drift is common after surgical management of IXT and several studies have attempted to reduce the rate of recurrence and reoperation by revealing the largest angle of exodeviation preoperatively, or by augmenting the amount of surgery [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The forced duction test (FDT) is a simple and useful method for diagnosing the presence of mechanical force or restriction of the extraocular muscles (EOM) and can be used to assess the tension or laxity of the lateral rectus muscle (LR) in IXT [13, 14]. The surgical outcome of exotropia surgery considering intraoperative assessment of relative LR tension has not been previously investigated. We investigated the surgical outcomes of unilateral lateral rectus recession–medial rectus resection (RR) performed in accordance with FDT results of the LR, and compared the results with those of conventional RR
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
