Abstract

Objectives: Surgeries performed for primary parotid malignancies vary, and the oncologic outcomes are undetermined. This study aims to: (1) Describe surgical outcomes of superficial versus total parotidectomy, and (2) describe surgical outcomes of observation versus cervical lymphadenectomy in patients with a N0 neck. Methods: Records of 129 consecutive patients with non-metastatic primary parotid cancer treated from 1988 to 2010 at the University of Utah and Intermountain Healthcare were reviewed. Treatment was superficial (47%) or total (53%) parotidectomy, 31% underwent concurrent cervical lymphadenectomy, and 67% received adjuvant radiotherapy due to high-risk features. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, surgical treatments, and oncologic outcomes were statistically analyzed. Results: Average age at diagnosis was 52 years. Mean follow-up was 7.4 years. Patient demographics, tumor grade, and histology were not predictive of recurrence or survival. Matching patients with Stage I/II disease (n = 74) and comparing superficial versus total parotidectomy, there was no difference in 5-year disease free rate, and 5- and 10-year overall survival rates (85%, 95%, and 88% versus 84%, 84% and 67%, respectively). Also, for Stage III (n = 18) and IV (n =33) disease there was no difference. For 101 patients with a N0 neck, 81 were observed and 20 underwent an elective cervical lymphadenectomy; there was no difference in outcomes (76%, 85%, and 72% versus 73%, 87%, and 67%, respectively). Conclusions: Treatment of primary parotid cancer requires meticulous surgical dissection and gross tumor resection; however, superficial versus total parotidectomy or observation versus elective cervical lymphadenectomy does not affect tumor recurrence rates or overall survival outcomes.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call