Abstract

The optimal revascularization for pediatric moyamoya for reducing the incidence of future stroke events remains to be determined. The authors conducted a search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science electronic databases from inception until January 2019. The primary endpoint was the presence of a future ischemic stroke event. Secondary endpoints were angiographic outcomes as measured by postoperative Matsushima grade and clinical symptom persistence. Patients who underwent either direct or combined direct/indirect revascularization were classified into the direct cohort. Data from each study on presence of postoperative stroke events were used to generate standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals, which were combined using inverse variance-weighted averages of standardized mean differences in a random effects model. Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria for analysis, comprising 2258 patients (1011 males, mean age 8.3 ± 1.8 years) who were followed up clinically for an average of 71.4 ± 51.3 months. One hundred fifty-four patients underwent direct bypass alone, 680 patients underwent either direct or combined direct/indirect revascularization procedures, while 1424 patients underwent indirect bypass alone. The frequencies of future stroke events in patients undergoing direct bypass alone, combined bypass, or indirect bypass alone were 1 per 190.3 patient-years, 1 per 108.9 patient-years, and 1 per 61.1 patient-years, respectively, in each cohort. The estimated stroke rates were 9.0% with indirect revascularization, 4.5% with direct revascularization alone, and 6.0% with combined revascularization. A forest plot did not reveal any significant differences in the incidence of future stroke events or angiographic outcomes following direct-only, combined, or indirect-only revascularization. Direct, indirect, and combined indirect/direct bypass techniques are all effective revascularization options for pediatric moyamoya disease. A relative paucity of granular studies-and inherent surgical selection bias-limits direct comparison between interventions. Suitably designed prospective cohort studies may be useful in identifying patients likely to receive benefit from specific procedures.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.