Abstract
Objective: The objective of this study was to introduce our institutional experience of treatment strategies (cervical subclavian artery reconstruction, thoracotomy subclavian artery reconstruction and endovascular treatment) for proximal isolated subclavian artery aneurysms (PISAAs). Methods: we retrospectively analyzed 15 consecutive patients with PISAAs treated by different treatment strategies (cervical reconstruction, thoracotomy reconstruction and endovascular treatment) in our institution from May 2016 to May 2022. Baseline data, surgery-related data, postoperative information and long-term follow-up were assessed. Results: A total of 17 PISAAs in 15 consecutive patients were treated in our institution. The success rates of subclavian artery reconstruction in the cervical reconstruction, the thoracotomy reconstruction and the endovascular treatment were 100%, 100 and 83.33%, respectively. About the involved vertebral artery, the reconstruction rates in the cervical reconstruction, the thoracotomy reconstruction, and the endovascular treatment were 80%, 75%, and 0, respectively. The intraoperative blood loss in the thoracotomy reconstruction was significantly higher than that in the cervical reconstruction and the endovascular treatment ( p<0.05). The total operation time of the thoracotomy reconstruction was significantly longer than that of the cervical reconstruction and the endovascular treatment ( p<0.05). In terms of postoperative ventilator use time, total postoperative drainage fluid, total postoperative drainage time, and ICU duration, both the thoracotomy reconstruction and the cervical reconstruction were significantly more than the endovascular treatment ( p<0.05). During the follow-up, one patient in the endovascular treatment underwent re-intervention 22 months after surgery due to in-stent occlusion. Conclusions: For patients with PISAAs, different treatment strategies are recommended depending on the size of the aneurysms and whether the involved vertebral arteries require reconstruction. Clinical impact This article is the largest study on the treatment strategies of PISAAs. By comparing the prognosis and complications of endovascular treatment with those of open surgery, it provides a certain reference basis for the choice of treatment for patients with PISAAs. For patients with aneurysms’ diameter of >50 mm, the thoracotomy subclavian artery reconstruction is recommended; for patients with aneurysms’ diameter of <30 mm requiring reconstruction of the involved vertebral arteries, the cervical subclavian artery reconstruction is recommended; for patients with aneurysms’ diameter of <30 mm not requiring reconstruction of the involved vertebral arteries, the endovascular treatment is recommended.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
