Surgical options for proximal and distal transverse arch hypoplasia in infants with coarctation.

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough various surgical techniques have been reported for aortic arch reconstruction for proximal and distal transverse arch (PDTA) hypoplasia, no consensus has been reached on a surgical option for initial arch reconstruction. This study was undertaken to review various arch reconstruction options for PDTA hypoplasia in Chinese infants.MethodsA retrospective review of 121 infants who underwent initial arch reconstruction of the proximal and distal aortic arches between 2010 and 2020 was performed. Freedom from recoarctation was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to determine perioperative data associated with an increased risk of recoarctation after surgery.ResultsAortic arch reconstruction was performed by end-to-side anastomosis (ESA) (n=37) or patch repair [autologous pericardial patch (APP), n=53; bovine pericardial patch (BPP), n=20; autologous pulmonary artery patch (APAP), n=11]. The relative diameter of the proximal arch was 0.51±0.07, and the relative diameter of the distal arch was 0.43±0.07. The median follow-up time was 679 (range, 388–1,362) days. Recoarctation was observed in 44 (36.4%) patients. ESA was an independent risk factor for further development of recoarctation after the initial aortic arch reconstruction [hazard ratio (HR) =2.13; P=0.020].ConclusionsAortic arch reconstruction via ESA was an independent risk factor for late recoarctation of the proximal and distal aortic arches in patients who underwent the initial surgery in infancy.Trial RegistrationChinese Clinical Trials Registry ChiCTR2100048212.