Abstract

Background We evaluated the clinicopathologic characteristics and oncologic outcome in patients who underwent surgical resection for multifocal ground-glass opacities (GGOs) of the lung. Methods We examined 131 patients who underwent surgical resections for multiple clinical-N0 lung cancers. Multifocal GGOs were defined as tumors showing GGO dominance with a consolidation/tumor ratio (CTR) < 0.5 for all, whereas solid lesions were defined as having at least one tumor that showed CTR ≥0.5. Results Multifocal GGOs were found in 53 (40.5%) patients. A significantly large number of GGOs with a median of 3 per patient (range 2-41) was observed in multifocal GGOs (p < 0.0001). A multivariate analysis demonstrated tumor size ≤ 20 mm (p = 0.0407) and multifocal GGOs (p = 0.0345) were significantly associated with the survival. Regarding surgical managements for multifocal GGOs, the 5-year overall survival (OS) of multiple synchronous or staged limited resection only (n = 26) versus anatomical resection with or without additional limited resection (n = 27) was not significantly different (100% and 91.9%, p = 0.2287). The total number of resected multifocal GGOs was 278, most of which revealed adenocarcinoma or precancerous lesions. Unresected or new GGOs developed in 19 (35.8%) patients, all of which remained pure-GGO of < 10 mm in size without any interventions. The 5-year OS of multifocal GGOs and solid lesions were 94.4% and 80.6% (p = 0.0096), with a median follow-up time of 60 months. Conclusion Surgical interventions combined with limited surgery or adequate follow-up management based on the findings on thin-section CT could provide acceptable oncologic outcomes for multifocal GGOs.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.