Surgical Management of Mandibular Subcondylar Fractures Under Local Anesthesia: A Proposed Protocol

Abstract

The optimal treatment for adult mandibular condylar fractures (MCFs) has largely shifted in favor of open reduction and rigid internal fixation. However, a sizeable portion of these injuries are still being treated in a closed manner based on old literature, convenience, results deemed acceptable, and lesser associated morbidity. Most MCFs with multiple associated facial traumas are appropriately treated under general anesthesia (GA). However, some selected isolated MCFs or those with minimal associated mandibular or low midfacial fractures can be treated optimally with patients under local anesthesia following a protocol presented in this article, thus expediting and simplifying their management. The purpose of this study was to develop a safe, sound, effective protocol for routine surgical management of mandibular subcondylar fractures under local anesthesia. We carried out a prospective clinical study to assess the feasibility of operating on MCFs with patients under local anesthesia. Seven patients with MCFs and other associated facial fractures underwent surgery after careful case selection following our proposed protocol. The outcome variables were 1) duration of the procedure, 2) intraoperative pain assessed by a visual analog scale, 3) fracture reduction assessed by measuring the preoperative and postoperative average fracture gap, 4) presence of malocclusion preoperatively and postoperatively, 5) deviation on mouth opening, and 6) maximal mouth opening. The mean duration of the procedure was 35.14minutes, and the mean rating of intraoperative pain or discomfort was 0.57 as reported on the visual analog scale by the patients. Mean mouth opening improved from 17.1 to 40.5mm, whereas deviation on opening improved from 4.4 to 0.28mm. The average fracture gap was reduced from 6.32 to 0.97mm. The presented protocol is a straightforward, efficient, safe, cost-effective tool for operating on MCFs, avoiding GA with its attendant risks and complications, that can be used routinely, as well as in patients for whom GA is deemed unsuitable.