Abstract

BackgroundFocal chondral defects of the knee are common. Several surgical techniques have been proposed for the management of chondral defects: microfractures (MFX), osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT), autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI)—first generation (pACI), second generation (cACI) and third generation (mACI). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to compare these surgical strategies for chondral defects in knee at midterm follow-up.MethodsThis Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted according to the PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions. PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase and Scopus databases were accessed in July 2021. All the prospective comparative clinical trials investigating two or more surgical interventions for chondral defects of the knee were accessed. The network meta-analyses were performed through a Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model analysis. The log odds ratio (LOR) effect measures were used for dichotomic variables, while the standardized mean difference (SMD) for the continuous variables.ResultsData from 2220 procedures (36 articles) were retrieved. The median follow-up was 36 (24 to 60) months. The ANOVA test found good baseline comparability between symptoms duration, age, sex and body mass index. AMIC resulted in higher Lysholm score (SMD 3.97) and Tegner score (SMD 2.10). AMIC demonstrated the lowest rate of failures (LOR −0.22) and the lowest rate of revisions (LOR 0.89). As expected, MFX reported the lower rate of hypertrophy (LOR −0.17) followed by AMIC (LOR 0.21). No statistically significant inconsistency was found in the comparisons.ConclusionAMIC procedure for focal chondral defects of the knee performed better overall at approximately 3 years’ follow-up.

Highlights

  • Focal chondral defects of the knee are common [1]

  • During osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT), single or multiple autologous osteochondral grafts are harvested from a donor site and transplanted into the chondral defect [13]

  • Given the complexity of these injuries, and the number of surgical techniques for knee chondral defects, a Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to compare these strategies for the surgical management of focal chondral defects of the knee at midterm follow-up

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Focal chondral defects of the knee are common [1]. Avascularity and hypocellularity, along with minimal metabolic activity of cartilage, lead to a limited selfrepair capability [2,3,4]. During osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT), single or multiple autologous osteochondral grafts are harvested from a donor site and transplanted into the chondral defect [13] Another surgical technique, namely autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI), has been in use since 1994 [14]. In AMIC, following MFX of the chondral defect, a membrane is used to cover the lesion in a single step surgery [8, 20]. Several surgical techniques have been proposed for the management of chondral defects: microfractures (MFX), osteochondral autograft transplantation (OAT), autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI)—first generation (pACI), second generation (cACI) and third generation (mACI). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to compare these surgical strategies for chondral defects in knee at midterm follow-up

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call