Surgical Interventions for Congenital Ptosis: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 14 Randomized Controlled Trials.

Abstract

Several types of surgeries have been used in the treatment of congenital ptosis, but the optimal methods and materials for this treatment are unknown. The study aims to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of various surgical methods and materials for treatment of congenital ptosis. We performed comprehensive searches of five databases, two clinical trial registries and one gray literature database from inception to January 2022 for related trials to include in this study. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of surgical methods and materials on the primary outcomes: margin reflex distance 1 (MRD1), palpebral fissure height (PFH), and degree of lagophthalmos; and secondary outcomes: undercorrection, entropion, corneal epithelial defects, wound dehiscence, recurrence, infection, and cosmetic outcomes. A total of 14 trials evaluating 909 eyes of 657 patients were included in our study. Compared with the levator plication, the frontalis sling significantly increased the MRD1 (MD = - 1.21; 95% CI [- 1.69, - 0.73]), and the levator resection significantly increased the PFH (MD = 1.30; 95% CI [0.27, 2.33]). For the frontalis sling surgical patterns, the fox pentagon was significantly better than the double triangle at improving the degree of lagophthalmos (MD = 0.70; 95% CI [0.32, 1.08]), while the opened pattern provided statistically better cosmetic outcome than the closed frontalis sling. Analysis of surgical material showed that absorbable sutures significantly increased the MRD1 (MD = 1.16; 95% CI [0.60, 1.72]) compared to non-absorbable sutures when used in levator plication; frontalis sling surgeries performed with silicon rods significantly increased the PFH (MD = 0.88; 95% CI [0.29, 1.47]) compared to those performed with Gore-Tex strips, while autogenous fascia lata provided statistically better aesthetic outcome for lid height symmetry and contour. Different surgical methods and materials appear to affect different aspects of the congenital ptosis treatment outcome. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .