Surgical implications and results of combined aortic valve replacement and myocardial revascularization

Abstract

To better define the indications for and results of simultaneous aortic valve replacement and myocardial revascularization, a cohort of 271 patients with angiographically defined coronary anatomy who underwent xenograft bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement were analyzed. Two hundred and twelve patients had predominant aortic stenosis, and 55 had pure aortic regurgitation. Discordance between the clinical assessment of angina and the angiographic assessment of coronary artery disease was apparent in 39 percent of the patients with aortic stenosis and 45 percent of the patients with aortic regurgitation. Thirty-seven percent of patients in the aortic stenosis subgroup without angina and 41 percent of patients in the aortic regurgitation subgroup without angina had hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic valve replacement were performed in 101 patients. The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction and operative death was significantly greater ( P < 0.05) in the subsets of patients with coronary disease than in those without coronary disease (9.9 percent versus 0.7 percent and 8.3 percent versus 2.2 percent, respectively). Late postoperative angina and myocardial infarction also correlated with the preoperative presence of coronary artery disease. Excluding operative mortality, the late actuarial survival rate (mean follow-up, 1.6 years; maximal follow-up, 4.9 years) was not statistically lower for the patients with coronary disease. It is concluded that angina pectoris in patients with aortic valve disease is not a reliable indicator of coronary artery disease and that patients with coronary disease who undergo aortic valve replacement have an increased risk. It is inferred from this study that preoperative coronary arteriography is advisable in most adults undergoing the evaluation of aortic valve disease and that simultaneous aortic valve replacement and myocardial revascularization may provide some protection against late attrition due to the combined effects of coexistent aortic valve and coronary artery disease.