Surgical Human Resources According to Types of Health Care Facility: An Assessment in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Shirwa Sheik Ali,Annette M Nkwowane,Hernan Montenegro Von Muhlenbrock,Zahra Jaffry,James Campbell,Andrew J M Leather,Meena N Cherian,Teena Kunjumen,Edward Kelley

doi:10.1007/s00268-017-4078-4

Abstract

BackgroundA robust health care system providing safe surgical care to a population can only be achieved in conjunction with access to competent surgical personnel. It has been reported that 5 billion people do not have access to safe, affordable surgical and anaesthesia care when needed. This study aims to fill the existing gap in evidence by quantifying shortfalls in trained personnel delivering safe surgical and anaesthetic care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) according to the type of health care facility.MethodsWe conducted secondary analysis of 1323 health facilities, in 35 low- and middle-income countries using facility-based cross-sectional data from the World Health Organization Situational Analysis Tool to Assess Emergency and Essential Surgical Care.ResultsThe majority of surgical and anaesthetic care in LMICs was provided by general doctors (range 13.8–41.1%; mean 27.1%). Non-physicians made up a significant proportion of the surgical workforce in LMICs. 26.76% of the surgical and anaesthetic workforce was provided by clinical medical officers and nurses. Private/NGO/mission hospitals, large, well-resourced institutions had the highest proportion of surgeons compared to any other type of health care facility at 27.92%. This compares to figures of 18.2 and 19.96% of surgeons at health centres and subdistrict/community hospitals, respectively, representing the lowest level of health facility.ConclusionsWe highlight the significant proportion of non-physicians delivering surgical and anaesthetic care in LMICs and illustrate wide variations according to the type of health care facility.

Highlights

A robust health care system providing safe surgical care to a population can only be achieved in conjunction with access to competent surgical personnel
Non-physicians made up a significant proportion of the surgical workforce in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). 26.76% of the surgical and anaesthetic workforce was provided by clinical medical officers and nurses
LMICs and illustrate wide variations according to the type of health care facility

Summary

Introduction

A robust health care system providing safe surgical care to a population can only be achieved in conjunction with access to competent surgical personnel. Organization, Geneva, Switzerland poorest third of the world’s population obtain only 3.5% of surgical operations conducted globally and that 5 billion people do not have access to safe, affordable surgical and anaesthesia care when needed [1, 2]. This is, in part, due to shortfalls in trained personnel, infrastructure and political priority [3, 4]. It has been reported that 5 billion people do not have access to safe, affordable surgical and anaesthesia care when needed. This study aims to fill the existing gap in evidence by quantifying shortfalls in trained personnel delivering safe surgical and anaesthetic care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) according to the type of health care facility

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion