Surgical Decompression versus Conservative Treatment in Patients with Malignant Infarction of the Middle Cerebral Artery: Direct Comparison of Death-Related Complications

Abstract

Surgical decompression and conservative treatment are routinely used in the treatment of patients with malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery (MIMCA). However, efficacy and safety are controversial. The purpose of this study is to systematically compare the clinical outcomes between surgical decompression and conservative treatment in patients with MIMCA. This study retrieved available academic randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical outcomes between surgical decompression and conservative treatment in patients with MIMCA from the databases of ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Embase, and PubMed. The references of previous reviews and related clinical studies were manually checked to retrieve potential literature that was not involved in our electronic search results. A total of 7 RCTs were included in the study. The overall number of participants in the surgical decompression group was 165, whereas it was 173 in the conservative treatment group. The results revealed that the surgical decompression group was related to a lower incidence of 1-year death (odds ratio [OR], 0.192; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.119-0.309; P < 0.001), 1-year death in patients >60 years of age (OR, 0.202; 95% CI, 0.097-0.421; P < 0.001), 1-year death in patients <60 years of age (OR, 0.145; 95% CI, 0.069-0.301; P < 0.001), 1-year death in patients treated within 48 hours of stroke onset (OR, 0.159; 95% CI, 0.090-0.282; P < 0.001), and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤3 (OR, 2.082; 95% CI, 1.185-3.658; P < 0.001). Based on current evidence for patients with MIMCA, decompressive surgery not only is a life-saving therapy but also reduces the incidence of mortality without increasing the risk of severe disability.