Surgical and oncological outcomes of an improved nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy technique: 6 years of experience at two centres

Abstract

ObjectiveAn improved nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy (NSRH), which is based on the paravesico-vaginal space, has been recently introduced in a phase II, prospective clinical trial by our team. This study aims to report the surgical and oncological outcomes of this improved NSRH. MethodsOne hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients were enrolled in our study and underwent the improved NSRH. The proportion of successful catheter removal and postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) of 50 mL or less at postoperative day 7 or day 4 was used to assess surgical outcomes. The local control rate (LCR), disease free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were used to assess oncological outcomes. ResultsPostoperative 30-day complications occurred in 27/177 (15.3%) patients. The rate of successful catheter removal and PVR of 50 mL or less were 85.2% (23/27) and 66.7% (18/27) at postoperative day 7, and 73.3% (110/150) and 35.3% (53/150) at postoperative day 4. A total of 13 (7.9%) patients showed recurrence after a median follow-up time of 39.2 months (range 3.2–68.1 months). The estimated 2-year and 5-year DFS rates were 92.2% and 91.1%, respectively. Seven (4.2%) patients presented local recurrence, and five (3.0%) patients were dead at the end of the follow-up period. The estimated 5-year LCR and OS were 95.1% and 96.2%, respectively. In univariate analysis, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and lymph node metastasis were found to be the prognostic risk factors of DFS. Patients with LVSI were associated with a worse DFS according to the multivariate analysis. ConclusionsThe improved NSRH in our study may provide better surgical outcomes without compromising the survival in patients with early cervical cancer.