Surgery Versus Transcatheter Interventions for Significant Paravalvular Prosthetic Leaks

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study sought to assess the relative merit of surgical correction (SC) versus transcatheter reduction on long-term outcomes in patients with significant paravalvular leak (PVL) refractory to medical therapy. BackgroundPVL is the most frequent dysfunction following prosthetic valve replacement. Although repeat surgery is the gold standard, transcatheter reduction (TR) of PVL has been associated with reduced mortality. MethodsFrom 1994 to 2014, 231 patients underwent SC (n = 151) or TR (n = 80) PVL correction. Propensity matching and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the effect of either intervention on long-term rates of all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure. Survival after TR and SC were further compared with the survival in a matched general population and to matched patients undergoing their first surgical valve replacement. ResultsOver a median follow-up of 3.5 years, SC was associated with an important reduction in all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure compared with TR (hazard ratio: 0.28; 95% confidence interval: 0.18 to 0.44; p < 0.001). There was a trend towards reduced all-cause death following SC versus TR (hazard ratio: 0.61; 95% confidence interval: 0.37 to 1.02; p = 0.06). Neither intervention normalized survival when compared with a general population or patients undergoing their first surgical valve replacement. ConclusionsIn patients with significant prosthetic PVL, surgery is associated with better long-term outcomes compared with transcatheter intervention, but results in important perioperative mortality and morbidity. Future studies are needed in the face of increasing implementation of transcatheter PVL interventions across the world.