Abstract

Aortic valve replacement is the gold standard for the management of patients with severe aortic stenosis or mixed pathology that is not amenable to repair according to currently available guidelines. Such a simplified approach may be suitable for many patients, but it is far from ideal for young adults considering emerging evidence demonstrating that conventional valve replacement in this cohort of patients is associated with inferior long-term survival when compared to the general population. Moreover; the utilisation of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves can significantly impact on quality and is linked to increased rates of morbidities. Other available options such as stentless valve, homografts, valve reconstruction and Ross operation can be an appealing alternative to conventional valve replacement. Young patients should be fully informed about all the options available - shared decision making is now part of modern informed consent. This can be achieved when referring physicians have a better understanding of the short and long term outcomes associated with every intervention, in terms of survival and quality of life. This review presents up to date evidence for available surgical options for young adults with aortic stenosis and mixed disease not amenable to repair.

Highlights

  • Current guidelines recommend prosthetic valves replacement as the gold standard for the management of patients with severe Aortic stenosis (AS) or mixed pathology while dividing recommendations based on single age cut off [1, 2]

  • This review presents up to date evidence for available surgical options for young adults with aortic stenosis and mixed disease not amenable to repair

  • Prosthetic valve replacement may not be the best option for young adults as it can be associated with complications such as thromboembolism, bleeding and limited durability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Current guidelines recommend prosthetic valves replacement as the gold standard for the management of patients with severe AS or mixed pathology while dividing recommendations based on single age cut off [1, 2]. Such a simplified approach may be suitable for many patients but it is far from ideal for young adults. Prosthetic valve replacement may not be the best option for young adults as it can be associated with complications such as thromboembolism, bleeding and limited durability.

Aortic Valve Surgery in Young Adults
Stented Tissue or Mechanical Valve Replacement
The Ross Operation
Homografts and Stentless Valves
Complete Valve Reconstruction
Homografts and Tissue Valves
Aortic Valvulotomy and Valvuloplasty
Main outcome
Ross compared to mechanical AVR
Valve reconstruction
Autografts can significantly improve long term outcomes in patients
Conventional AVR vs Ross
Ross vs Homografts
Conclusion
Findings
Author Contributions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call