Abstract
Abstract Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive treatment option for patients with intracranial lesions. The success of LITT is dependent on accurate placement of the laser probe in target tissue. Placement can be facilitated by various stereotactic methods, including the Robotic Surgical Assistant (ROSA) ONE Brain robotic platform. The aim of this study is to examine the accuracy of stereotactic probe placement utilizing the ROSA robot. Primary outcomes were entry distance, target distance, and entry angle error. Accuracy differences between two major LITT platforms, the Neuroblate (Monteris Medical) and Visualase Systems, were compared. A prospective institutional database was used to identify all patients who underwent LITT for intracranial tumors utilizing the ROSA robot between 2013-2023. The sign test was used to compare error values to test their difference from a null value of 0. Spearman correlation was used to assess the relationship between angle of error and trajectory length. Kuskal-Wallis test was used to compare errors and trajectory length between the two companies. Of the 105 patients who underwent LITT during the study period, 337 probes were placed. For Visualase probes, median entry distance (1.1mm, IQR=0.4-2.0), target distance (1.6mm, IQR =0.9-2.4), and entry angle error (1.5°, IQR=0.9-2.5), were significantly different than zero (p=<.0001). For Neuroblate probes, median entry distance (1.5mm, IQR=1.0-2.1), target distance (1.8mm, IQR=1.1-2.4), and entry angle error (1.8°, IQR=1.1-2.5) were significantly different than zero (p=<.0001). When comparing laser systems, there was a significant difference in median entry distance error with Neuroblate having a higher error (1.5mm, IQR=1.0-2.1) than Visualase (1.1mm IQR=0.4-2.0, p=0.0041). Stereotactic placement of LITT probes utilizing the ROSA robotic system was not able to achieve perfect alignment with the planned trajectory. When comparing the systems, Visualase probes were placed more accurately at the entry point than Neuroblate probes.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
