SURG-13. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF IMPACT OF EXTENT OF RESECTION ON SURVIVAL ON GLIOBLASTOMA, IDH-WILDTYPE, WHO GRADE 4 (WHO 2021)

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma diagnostic criteria have been redefined with the 5th edition of WHO classification of tumors of the central nervous system. Glioblastomas are defined as IDH wildtype diffuse astrocytic glioma tumors with one of the following features: microvascular proliferation, or necrosis, or TERT promoter mutation, or EGFR gene amplification, or +7/-10 chromosome copy number changes. The aim of this study is to establish the impact of extent of resection in overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (WT), WHO grade 4 (WHO 2021). METHODS Systematic literature search was performed using the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify studies comparing OS and PFS after gross total resection (GTR) vs subtotal resection (STR) or biopsy for glioblastoma IDH-WT. Prognostic hazard ratios (HR) for OS and PFS were analyzed using a random-effects model. RESULTS We identified 1439 publications. Nine studies met inclusion/exclusion criteria. 788 patients underwent GTR out of 1818. The meta-analysis showed a significant increase in OS and PFS duration when undergoing GTR for glioblastoma IDH-WT with a median OS of 20 months 95% CI (17-25) compared to 12 months 95% CI (9-15) for STR or biopsy and a median PFS of 11 months 95% CI (9-12) for GTR compared to 7 months 95% CI (5-7) for STR or biopsy respectively. GTR showed a 49% significant reduction of mortality risk HR=0.51 95%CI (0.42-0.59) and a 44% significant reduction of progression risk HR=0.56 95%CI (0.41-0.71) compared to STR or biopsy. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review indicates that GTR may be associated with improved OS and PFS compared to STR or biopsy for Glioblastoma, IDH-WT, WHO grade 4 (WHO 2021). However, this is limited by variable study design and significant clinical and methodological heterogeneity among studies.