Abstract

Core Ideas Confirmed for the first time that certain wetting agents can remove organic coatings that cause soil hydrophobicity. A novel laboratory experiment was performed to precisely quantify this effect. Possible mechanisms regarding the removal of organic coatings following application of certain wetting agents were discussed. Soil surfactants, which represent a wide range of wetting agent chemistries, have been used as the primary tool for mitigating drought issues caused by soil water repellency (SWR). However, the residual effects of soil surfactants are often short‐lived, requiring repeated applications. Alternatively, certain groups of wetting agents may remove hydrophobic organic matter for extended control of SWR. This laboratory study investigated the effects of selected wetting agent chemistries, including products of alkyl block polymer (ABP), nonionic surfactant + acidifiers (NIS), and polyoxyalkylene polymer (PoAP), for removing organic matter and reducing SWR. Naturally‐occurring hydrophobic sand was packed into sand columns and subjected to wetting agent application. The treated columns were then washed three times with deionized water, and the volume of the leachates from each wash event was determined. Sand treated by PoAP showed enhanced water‐holding capacity, although the effect diminished after the second wash. In comparison, ABP resulted in 2.3‐fold greater output of combined dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and particulate organic carbon (POC) in the leachates than PoAP, and made the hydrophobic sand completely wettable. Alternatively, NIS showed similar effects compared with the control. Although PoAP reduced SWR to a minimum level, it was sorbed strongly to the sand, which resulted in 27% greater solid phase organic carbon (SOC) in treated sand, compared with the untreated control. However, the exact mechanisms underlying surfactant effects on DOC and POC are unclear and the long‐term effects of surfactants following repeated application in the field are yet to be determined.

Highlights

  • Soil surfactants, which represent a wide range of wetting agent chemistries, have been used as the primary tool for mitigating drought issues caused by soil water repellency (SWR)

  • Application of alkyl block polymer (ABP) or polyoxyalkylene polymer (PoAP) reduced SWR to none or minimum, respectively. These results indicated a reversal of SWR following application of ABP or PoAP, despite the two wetting agents having distinctly different effects on solid phase organic carbon (SOC) (Fig. 1)

  • The chemical properties of the applied wetting agents influenced their performance in interacting with organic coatings on sand, and data collected after single applications of ABP and PoAP wetting agents suggest that these properties contributed to the sorption and desorption effects, which facilitated increased surface wettability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Soil surfactants, which represent a wide range of wetting agent chemistries, have been used as the primary tool for mitigating drought issues caused by soil water repellency (SWR). Certain groups of wetting agents may remove hydrophobic organic matter for extended control of SWR. This laboratory study investigated the effects of selected wetting agent chemistries, including products of alkyl block polymer (ABP), nonionic surfactant + acidifiers (NIS), and polyoxyalkylene polymer (PoAP), for removing organic matter and reducing SWR. PoAP reduced SWR to a minimum level, it was sorbed strongly to the sand, which resulted in 27% greater solid phase organic carbon (SOC) in treated sand, compared with the untreated control. Confirmed for the first time that certain wetting agents can remove organic coatings that cause soil hydrophobicity. Possible mechanisms regarding the removal of organic coatings following application of certain wetting agents were discussed. Soil water repellency (SWR) results in uneven water distribution in the soil profile, and often leads to localized dry spots (LDS) on sand-based turf systems such as golf course tees and putting greens (Wilkinson and Miller, 1978)

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.