Abstract
The photocatalytic activity of a hydrogen fluoride (HF)-treated rutile TiO2(001) surface for the decomposition reaction of linoleic acid was lower than that of an as-received (polished) rutile TiO2(001) surface. The surfaces of as-received TiO2(001) and HF-treated TiO2(001) were investigated using low-energy electron diffraction (LEED) and surface X-ray diffraction (SXRD) to elucidate differences in their photocatalytic activities. The as-received (polished) surface did not yield good LEED patterns, which implied that the surface was not well-ordered and was thus not examined using SXRD. In contrast, the HF-treated surface produced good LEED patterns with a 1 × 1 structure and was thus studied using SXRD. The analysis of crystal truncation rods indicated that all atoms in the four layers of the surface moved toward the bulk and that the HF-treated surface was (101)-faceted with terraces. On average, the facet was found to be four layers deep. The difference in the condition of the surface influences the photocatalytic activity of the surface.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.