Surface topography of resorbable porcine collagen membranes, and their effect on early osteogenesis: An in vitro study

Abstract

ObjectiveGuided tissue regeneration (GTR) is based on the use of different membranes that function as sealants and barriers in specific clinical situations. Among the several tissue production methods and origins, resorbable porcine-derived membranes are the most commonly used. Because these membranes are so diverse, and have several different clinical applications, doubts linger as to their effect in stimulating osteogenesis. The objective of this study was to make an in vitro evaluation of the viability and differentiation of osteoblastic cells cultured on the surface of the following collagen membranes: Jason® (Botiss Biomaterials), Collprotect® (Botiss Biomaterials), and Bio-Gide® (Geistlich). Material and methodsFragments of the 3 resorbable collagen membranes (5 × 5 mm) were used, and pre-osteoblastic SAOS-2 cells (ATCC, USA) were plated on their porous surfaces. Evaluation of the membranes was performed at 3, 5 and 7 days, considering the following parameters: (1) topographic analysis of the different surfaces by scanning electron microscope; (2) cellular viability by MTT, (3) quantification of type I collagen and osteopontin by Elisa. The quantitative analyses were carried out using a significance level of 5%. ResultsCollprotect® and Jason® membranes presented a rough surface with an irregular aspect on both sides, while double-layered Bio-Gide® had one layer with a smooth surface and the other with a rough surface along each respective length. The viability assays revealed that the cells cultured the cells grown on Collprotect® showed higher viability than those grown in Bio-Gide® or Jason®, especially after 5 and 7 days. After 3 and 5 days, evaluation of type I collagen showed that the cells plated on the Jason® and Collprotect® surfaces had greater collagen secretion than those plated on BioGide®. After 7 days, an increase in osteopontin levels was observed when the cells were plated on all the experimental membranes, compared with the control group. ConclusionAll the tested membranes were suitable for use in GTR clinical procedures. Their indication in specific regenerative cases depends on the mechanical and biological properties of their originating tissues, thus enabling better results and assertive choices by dental professionals.