Abstract

It is critical to study the surface properties of pyrite and arsenopyrite by oxidation and its effect on flotation behavior. The recovery of pyrite and arsenopyrite reduced with increasing pH but remained flotation-competent, whereas both minerals were non-flotation-competent after oxidation at pH > 6. XPS revealed that the surface of oxidized pyrite was rich in SO42- and FeOOH, but arsenopyrite had some FeAsO4 in addition to these two oxidation products, and arsenopyrite showed a higher oxidation degree than pyrite for same oxidation period. In the AFM scan results, the roughness of the oxidized pyrite surface and the distribution rate of the oxidation products were lower than in arsenopyrite. Calculation results showed that the most stable surfaces of pyrite and arsenopyrite were S-exposed surfaces with similar S-atom arrangement patterns. The bonding between Fe(OH)2-, the main component of the oxidation products at pH = 6, and Fe atoms on the surfaces of pyrite and arsenopyrite, as well as the exothermic and favourable adsorption process, indicated that oxidised mineral surfaces adsorbed large amounts of hydroxylated iron compounds, and thus the trap xanthic acid appeared to be unable to adsorb on the oxidised surfaces. This study adds to our understanding of the surface oxidation of pyrite and arsenopyrite and the mechanisms by which they affect flotation behaviour.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call