Abstract

Siliceous spicules in demosponges exist in a variety of shapes, some of which look like minute spheres of glass. They are called “sterrasters” when they belong to the Geodiidae family (Tetractinellida order) and “selenasters” when they belong to the Placospongiidae family (Clionaida order). Today, the Geodiidae represent a highly diverse sponge family with more than 340 species, occurring in shallow to deep waters worldwide, except for the Antarctic. The molecular phylogeny of Geodiidae is currently difficult to interpret because we are lacking morphological characters to support most of its clades. To fill this knowledge gap, the surface microornamentations of sterrasters were compared in different genera. Observations with scanning electron microscopy revealed four types of surfaces, which remarkably matched some of the Geodiidae genera: type I characteristic of Geodia, type II characteristic of Pachymatisma, Caminus, and some Erylus; type III characteristic of other Erylus; type IV characteristic of Caminella. Two subtypes were identified in Geodia species: warty vs. smooth rosettes. These different microornamentations were mapped on new Geodiidae COI (Folmer fragment) and 28S (C1–D2) phylogenetic trees. The monophyly of the Geodiidae was once again challenged, thereby suggesting that sterrasters have evolved independently at least three times: in the Geodiinae, in the Erylinae and in Caminella. Surface microornamentations were used to review the fossil record of sterrasters and selenasters through the paleontology literature and examination of fossils. It was concluded that “rhaxes” in the literature may represent mixes of sterrasters and selenasters: while Rhaxella spicules may belong to the Placospongiidae, Rhaxelloides spicules belong to the Geodiidae. The putative Geodiidae fossil genera, Geoditesia, and Geodiopsis, are reallocated to Tetractinellida incertae sedis. Isolated Miocene-Pliocene fossil sterrasters Hataina (Huang, 1967), Silicosphaera (Hughes, 1985) and Conciliaspongia (Robinson and Haslett, 1995) become junior synonyms of Geodia (Lamarck, 1815). Overall, the fossil record suggested that Geodiidae was present at least since the Middle Jurassic (163–166 Mya), while Geodia sterrasters were present since the Santonian/Campanian boundary, Late Cretaceous (83.6 Mya).ZooBank Article Registrationurn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:91B1B3AC-8862-4751-B272-8A3BDF4DEE77.

Highlights

  • Siliceous spicules in demosponges exist in a variety of shapes, some of which look like minute spheres of glass

  • The present study proposes to test these two hypotheses: (i) surface microornamentations are different in the Geodiidae genera and (ii) smooth or warty rosette are restricted to certain Geodia clades

  • NTM Z005203 was originally identified as Geodia sp., “NCI135” in Redmond et al (2013) but reexamination of the specimen for this study revealed a typical oscule-like cloaca and the presence of characteristic short-shafted triaenes and spherules in the ectocortex so it was re-identified as Caminus sp

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Siliceous spicules in demosponges exist in a variety of shapes, some of which look like minute spheres of glass. These were first described and illustrated in the literature by Donati (1753), who found them in the species Geodia cydonium from the Adriatic Sea: he called these spicules “little balls.”. Sterrasters/aspidaster spicules are currently the main synapomorphy of the family Geodiidae (suborder Astrophorina, order Tetractinellida) This family currently includes five genera with sterrasters (Geodia, Erylus, Pachymatisma, Caminella, and Caminus) and several others that have secondarily lost their sterrasters (Ecionemia, Stelletinopsis, Rhabdastrella, Melophlus, Penares), some Stelletta, maybe even the Calthropellidae (Cárdenas et al, 2010, 2011). They can be massive animals, more than a meter large (Santucci, 1922; Corriero, 1987 (1989); Cárdenas et al, 2013), and six species of Geodia are abundant and important for the North Atlantic deep-sea ecosystems as key boreo-arctic sponge ground forming species (Klitgaard and Tendal, 2004; Cárdenas et al, 2013)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call