Abstract

The surface energy, particularly for nanoparticles, is one of the most important quantities in understanding the thermodynamics of particles. Therefore, it is astonishing that there is still great uncertainty about its value. The uncertainty increases if one questions its dependence on particle size. Different approaches, such as classical thermodynamics calculations, molecular dynamics simulations, and ab initio calculations, exist to predict this quantity. Generally, considerations based on classical thermodynamics lead to the prediction of decreasing values of the surface energy with decreasing particle size. This phenomenon is caused by the reduced number of next neighbors of surface atoms with decreasing particle size, a phenomenon that is partly compensated by the reduction of the binding energy between the atoms with decreasing particle size. Furthermore, this compensating effect may be expected by the formation of a disordered or quasi-liquid layer at the surface. The atomistic approach, based either on molecular dynamics simulations or ab initio calculations, generally leads to values with an opposite tendency. However, it is shown that this result is based on an insufficient definition of the particle size. A more realistic definition of the particle size is possible only by a detailed analysis of the electronic structure obtained from initio calculations. Except for minor variations caused by changes in the structure, only a minor dependence of the surface energy on the particle size is found. The main conclusion of this work is that surface energy values for the equivalent bulk materials should be used if detailed data for nanoparticles are not available.

Highlights

  • With respect to the thermodynamics of small particles, the surface energy is an essential, and in many cases the dominant, quantity

  • Studying the size dependence of the surface energy of nanoparticles, one finds different tendencies depending on the method of calculation

  • Considerations based on continuum thermodynamics predict decreasing values of the surface energy as function of decreasing particle size

Read more

Summary

Introduction

With respect to the thermodynamics of small particles, the surface energy is an essential, and in many cases the dominant, quantity. The contribution of the mechanical energy to the surface energy is, compared to the chemical contribution, minor [3] Based on this clarification, it is obvious that the lattice contraction data for small particles, abundant in the literature, may be used to calculate the size dependent surface stress, (see, e.g., [6,7,8]) but not, as it is done sometimes [9,10], to calculate the surface energy (“surface tension”). The experimental error bar covers the results of other authors In this range, the particles are glassy, indicating a structure more stable than a crystalline one [13,14]. The basic ideas of both approaches are explained in this paper

Approach based on classical thermodynamics and continuum considerations
Approach to the surface energy from atomistic calculations
Conclusion
License and Terms
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call