Abstract

Deaths and serious injuries caused by traffic accidents is a concerning public health problem. However, the problem can be mitigated by the Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) system, which can avoid the impact. The market penetration of AEB is exponentially growing, and non-impact situations are expected to become more frequent. Thus, new injury patterns must be analysed, and the neck is particularly sensitive to sudden acceleration changes. Abrupt braking would be enough to be a potential risk for cervical spine injury. There is controversy about whether or not there are differences in cervical behaviour depending on whether passengers are relaxed or contract their muscles before the imminent accident. In the present manuscript, 18 volunteers were subjected to two different levels of awareness during an emergency braking test. Cervical muscles (sternocleidomastoid and trapezius) were analysed by the sEMG signal captured by means of a low-cost system. The differences observed in the muscle response according to gender and age were notable when passengers are warned. Gender differences were more significant in the post-braking phase. When passengers were relaxed, subjects older than 35 registered higher sEMG values. Meanwhile, when passengers contract their muscles, subjects who were younger than or equal to 35 years old experienced an increment in the values of the sEMG signals.

Highlights

  • Deaths and serious injuries caused by traffic accidents represent a serious public health problem with broad social and economic consequences

  • If we focus on the results observed when passengers have not been warned of the emergency braking (BT1 test), men experienced higher surface electromyography (sEMG) signal intensity of trapezius in both phases, while women showed a greater cervical response of SCM in the post-braking stage

  • Men do not seem to experience large changes in the electromyographic signal depending on their age in the emergency braking phase. These results seem to indicate that as age increases, there is a greater risk of cervical injury, especially in the post-braking phase, when passengers are not warned about emergency braking

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Deaths and serious injuries caused by traffic accidents represent a serious public health problem with broad social and economic consequences. Protection provided by vehicles through an Assistance and Driving Aid System (ADAS) can help reduce this problem Among these systems, the Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) system stands out. The Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) system stands out This system identifies imminent collisions based on the recognition of objects placed in front of the vehicle by means of a camera and reacts automatically by activating the brakes. Considering the obligations established by the regulations to install AEB in all new vehicles, these emergency braking and, in some cases, non-impact situations are expected to become more and more frequent. There are several studies [6,7,8]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call