Abstract

This study compared the surface detail reproduction and dimensional accuracy of stone models obtained from molds disinfected with 2% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate or 0.2% peracetic acid to models produced using molds which were not disinfected, with 3 alginate materials (Cavex ColorChange, Hydrogum 5 and Jeltrate Plus). The molds were prepared over matrix containing 20-, 50-, and 75-µm lines, performed under pressure with perforated metal tray. The molds were removed following gelation and either disinfected (using one of the solutions by spraying followed by storage in closed jars for 15 min) or not disinfected. The samples were divided into 12 groups (n=5). Molds were filled with dental gypsum Durone IV and 1 h after the start of the stone mixing the models were separated from the tray. Surface detail reproduction and dimensional accuracy were evaluated using optical microscopy on the 50-µm line with 25 mm in length, in accordance with the ISO 1563 standard. The dimensional accuracy results (%) were subjected to ANOVA. The 50 µm-line was completely reproduced by all alginate impression materials regardless of the disinfection procedure. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean values of dimensional accuracy in combinations between disinfectant procedure and alginate impression material (p=0.2130) or for independent factors. The disinfectant solutions and alginate materials used in this study are no factors of choice regarding the surface detail reproduction and dimensional accuracy of stone models.

Highlights

  • Disinfection of tools and materials is an important step in dental procedures [1,2,3]

  • This study evaluated the surface detail reproduction and dimensional accuracy of stone models obtained from molds prepared using different alginate impression materials and disinfected using 2% NaOCl, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) or 0.2% peracetic acid compared with stone models produced from molds that were not disinfected

  • The null hypotheses tested were that the surface detail reproduction and dimensional accuracy of stone models are not affected by the alginate impression material or the disinfectant solution

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Disinfection of tools and materials is an important step in dental procedures [1,2,3]. The materials come into contact with fluids such as blood and saliva, which may contain pathogenic microorganisms. The surface detail reproduction and dimensional accuracy properties are necessary for a true copy of the molded anatomical structures Those properties are being used to analyze this ability of the impression materials [7]. This study evaluated the surface detail reproduction and dimensional accuracy of stone models obtained from molds prepared using different alginate impression materials and disinfected using 2% NaOCl, 2% chlorhexidine digluconate (CHX) or 0.2% peracetic acid compared with stone models produced from molds that were not disinfected. The null hypotheses tested were that the surface detail reproduction and dimensional accuracy of stone models are not affected by the alginate impression material or the disinfectant solution

MATERIAL AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call