Abstract
Assessing the project efficiency of irrigation systems and water use efficiency of crops over large irrigated areas requires daily or seasonal evapotranspiration (ET) maps. Mapping ET or latent heat flux (LE) can be achieved spatially for land surfaces using remote sensing inputs such as surface reflectance and radiometric surface temperature ( T s ). The energy balance (EB) equation requires net radiation ( R n ), soil heat flux ( G ), and sensible heat flux ( H ) to derive LE as a residual. Although R n and G can be estimated with acceptable accuracy, H may be under estimated when T s is used rather than the surface aerodynamic temperature ( T o ) in the aerodynamic resistance equation. The value of T o cannot be measured directly because it varies with atmospheric forcing resulting from radiation, wind speed and air temperature, and with variable surface conditions. In this study, T o for dryland cotton in the Texas High Plains and irrigated alfalfa in Colorado was determined using T s , air temperature, leaf area index, and surface aerodynamic resistance, and ET measurements obtained with large weighing lysimeters. The specific performance of the modeled T o for cotton and alfalfa was assessed using an aerodynamic profile method. Results indicated that the T o model based on aerodynamic resistance better agreed (0.2±1°C) with measured T o values using the aerodynamic profile method.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.